NEWS - July 2005

El Toro Info Site report, July 29, 2005

Community Visioning Report released


OC Register, July 29, 2005

“Plans for former El Toro Marine base unveiled”


El Toro Info Site report, July 28, 2005

See what excessive PR spending buys


El Toro Info Site report, July 27, 2005 - updated
GPC extends search for director

LA Times, July 27, 2005
“LAX-Area Cities Propose Deal With L.A. “

LA Times, July 26, 2005

“Mayor Picks Airport Commissioners”


OC Register editorial, July 25, 2005
Public relations mailer suggests its board wants credit more than credibility for project.”

El Toro Info Site report, July 24, 2005

Excessive PR spending has negative potential


El Toro Info Site report, July 21, 2005

ALUC gives up on El Toro Airport


Irvine World News, July 21, 2005
“Brochure costs under scrutiny”


LA Daily News, July 20, 2005
“Mayor reaches out to opponents of LAX expansion”


El Toro Info Site report, July 19, 2005

ALUC wants evidence that El Toro was sold.


Orange County Business Journal, Insider, July 18, 2005

“Build residences and they will come.”


El Toro Info Site report, July 16, 2005

SD Airport Authority Board studies three proposed civilian airport sites

 

El Toro Info Site report, July 15, 2005

Could there still be an El Toro airport?


Irvine World News, July 14, 2005

“It’s official: Great Park a big deal”


OC Register, July 13, 2005
"Military era ends at El Toro"

El Toro Info Site report, July 12, 2005

Denny Harris


El Toro Info Site report, July 12, 2005
Runway party update

El Toro Info Site report, July 12, 2005

An email from Washington


El Toro Info Site Report, July 12, 2005

Today is the day to declare victory


El Toro Info Site report, July 11, 2005

“Great Day for the Great Park” tomorrow


Daily Pilot, July 10, 2005
“Narrow focus is airport group's only drawback”

Daily Pilot, July 9, 2005
“Support of JWA caps is a good cause”

OC Weekly, July 8-14, 2005

“Agran Dispenses Great Pork”

“Massive PR spending will aid park chairman’s allies in upcoming election”

El Toro Info Site report, July 7, 2005

Development Agreement signing ceremony on July 12

Daily Pilot, July 7, 2005

“Grass-roots group seeks to ground JWA growth”


El Toro Info Site report, July 6, 2005 - updated

When's the runway demolition party?


El Toro Info Site report, July 2, 2005

El Toro closed six years ago


Click here for previous news stories

El Toro Info Site report, August 1, 2005
Regional air traffic shifts from LAX 

Air traffic statistics for the six airports that comprise the Southern California Association of Government’s region show an uneven recovery since September 11, 2001.

The total passenger demand served in the first half of 2005 is just short of where it was for the same period in 2001. In the first six months of 2001, the SCAG region saw 43 -1/4 million passengers fly through LAX, John Wayne, Ontario, Burbank, Long Beach and Palm Springs. For the same period in 2005 - after four years of gradual recovery - the total number climbed back up to 43 million this year. 

While the regional total has almost recovered from the impact of the terrorist attack, LAX failed to regain over 2 -3/4 million passengers. Statistics reviewed by this website show that the entire decrease at LAX can be accounted for by a drop in domestic passengers. Most of them resumed their flying at one of the region’s five other airports.

Long Beach added 1.22 million passengers comparing the first half of 2001 and the first half of 2005.

Orange
County’s John Wayne Airport – the second busiest in the region - picked up over one million additional fliers between the same six-month periods.  

6 months ending
June of:

2001
Millions of passengers
2005
Millions of passengers
Passenger increase
(decrease) in millions.
Regional total for
6 airports

43.25

43.00

   (0.25)

LAX

32.68

29.90

(2.78)

John Wayne (SNA)

3.70

4.72

1.02

Ontario

3.47

3.48

0.01

Burbank

2.33

2.54

0.21

Long Beach

0.28

1.50

1.22

Palm Springs

0.78

0.85

0.07

SNA, ONT, BUR, LBG, and PSP total

10.57

13.10

2.53

 


El Toro Info Site report, July 29, 2005

Community Visioning Report released

 

Today’s GPC media release states: “The Orange County Great Park Corporation today released its Community Visioning Report that finds county residents prefer that open space, public swimming pools, sports facilities, cultural and community amenities, major outdoor theatre and botanical gardens be considered in developing the Orange County Great Park.


Larry Agran, the Corporation’s chairman, said, “This important information will now be given to each of the seven design firms competing to be master designer of the Great Park. Design concepts are to reflect what the people of Orange County want to have and see in their Great Park.” 

 

Website Editor: The Great Park Corp budget for “design needs assessment” is $385,000. Of this, the stakeholder conference and various surveys used for the visioning process - conducted between mid-May and late June - were expected to cost $235,000.


OC Register, July 29, 2005 - updated

“Plans for former El Toro Marine base unveiled”

"Five hours of weirdness, all for you, courtesy of Irvine politics."


At Thursday’s meeting of the Great Park Corp board, “Without revealing many details, spokesmen from Lennar Communities said the plan calls for three districts on the privately owned portions of the land.”

”Developed along the park's periphery, a ‘lifelong learning’ district, a transit-oriented district and a park district each would offer ‘unique portals’ into the 3,718-acre park, said Bob Santos, a Lennar spokesman.”

”The lifelong-learning district would offer education opportunities for everyone from kindergartners to doctoral students. Lennar's presentation suggested that both private and public schools would be invited to participate.”

”The transit-oriented district would include a mix of residential and commercial uses.”

”The park district would include housing, a golf course and "agricultural uses" that the company did not specify.”

”Forde & Mollrich's contract with Irvine has come under scrutiny because of allegations that the consultant overcharged the city for a Great Park brochure. The board voted down a motion made by Christina Shea to put the contract out to competitive bidding.” Shea, anticipating that her motion would fail, also requested disclosure of the identity of the brochure's mystery printer whose name was whited out on an invoice.

 

Columnist Frank Mickadeit weighed in on the F&M item which led to his use of the "weirdness" title in his column. “Rather than doing the prudent thing - which would have no other effect than to make a highly paid vendor more accountable - the board majority resorted to a tactic it has used in the past when doing the right thing might make life a little less comfortable for Agran's friends. It took turns recasting Shea's allegations into something they aren't.”

Click here for both articles.

 

Website Editor: Better still, if you have the time, watch the meeting online in streaming video and draw your own conclusions. Click here and then scroll down to the link for Orange County Great Park meetings. Select the July 28 meeting. When the player comes up, you have the option to “Jump to . . .” item 4. Communications consultant work – public comments, which is the part discussing Shea's motion.


El Toro Info Site report, July 28, 2005

See what excessive PR spending buys

 

The recent discussions about Irvine’s excessive PR spending on behalf of the Great Park bring to mind the County’s excessive PR spending on behalf of the airport.

 

When the County’s multi-million dollar PR blitz to sell the airport was halted by a judge in late 2001, the Just the Facts website shut down. Seemingly lost in cyberspace was $200,000 of work on the site which was online for less than a year.

 

We recently searched and rediscovered many of the County’s web pages. Among the recovered material was an elaborate animation of the flight paths for El Toro. The presentation is a classic example of how throwing PR money at an issue does not necessarily buy much in the way of favorable results.

 

For those with a high speed Internet connection, click here to revisit Just the Facts – a public information program of the El Toro Local Redevelopment Authority and its 3D movie Welcome to the El Toro Flight Take-offs and Landing Demonstration.


El Toro Info Site report, July 27, 2005 - updated
GPC extends search for director

The Great Park Corp originally set a July 22 cutoff for applicants interested in replacing former director Dick Sim. The GPC announced today that the deadline has been extended to August 31. Only one application had been received by the original deadline.

The GPC board meets at 1:00 PM Thursday at Irvine City Hall. On the agenda is a discussion of the Forde Mollrich PR contract. Councilmember Christina Shea was not allowed to have the matter discussed at the City Council but did agendize it for the Great Park Corp board's consideration.

See Frank Mickadeit's column for more on this "don't miss meeting".

LA Times, July 27, 2005
“LAX-Area Cities Propose Deal With L.A. “


”Cities near Los Angeles International Airport want Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to limit the number of passengers who use the airport and cancel plans for an off-site check-in center in exchange for dropping their lawsuits against the city.”

”A confidential 15-point settlement proposal obtained by The Times also asks the mayor to take more steps to lessen the effects of noise, air pollution and traffic; spread flights to airports around the region; and pay legal costs for the lawsuit.”

”Some attorneys emphasized that the proposal is very preliminary. ‘Those points are very general and conceptual. They are not settlement points,’ said Barbara Lichman, an attorney for the county, Inglewood and Culver City.’”  Website Editor: Viewers of this site are probably not delighted to see Ms.Lichman's involvement in these discussions, given her past position supporting the need for a commercial airport at El Toro.


”Airport-area residents said their settlement proposal would ask Los Angeles to limit passengers at LAX by reducing the number of gates where airplanes park. But it is unclear whether such a move would be legal because federal law prohibits airport operators from constraining capacity. Airlines have also said that they would oppose such an agreement.”

”The mayor also remarked this week that his first priority for the city's airport agency is figuring out how to distribute burgeoning growth in air traffic among the region's airports.”

More . . .


LA Times, July 26, 2005

“Mayor Picks Airport Commissioners”

 

“Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa announced his nominees to the civilian seven-member Airport Commission on Monday and said the group would focus on spreading air traffic among the region's airports while limiting growth at Los Angeles International.”

 

“He said that LAX is critical to the region's economy, but that he expected other airports to help serve a projected doubling of air traffic in the Southland by 2030.”

 

"’The people of Los Angeles are willing to share in the benefits of air travel if Southern California is willing to share in the burdens.’"

 

“Villaraigosa didn't provide specifics on how a regional air traffic system would work, saying only that ‘we've got plenty of ideas.’"

 

Website Editor: No mention of Orange County but what are those “ideas”?

 

More . . .


OC Register editorial, July 25, 2005
Public relations mailer suggests its board wants credit more than credibility for project.”

 

The Register takes a more moderate tone with today’s editorial column in contrast to yesterday’s tasteless editorial cartoon poking fun at the Great Park’s top advocate.

 
The Register’s headline and message clearly echo the point raised in the OC Weekly several days ago and that we hear quite often.


“Certainly, the cost of the PR contracts and mailer should be questioned. Questioned, too, should be the purpose of such a mailing. The city doesn't have to convince anyone about anything at the park at this point. Straightforward informational pieces can be produced for far less. Some critics wonder whether the goal is to raise the profile of the politicians charged with overseeing the park's development.”


Website Editor: See our comments below from yesterday.

El Toro Info Site report, July 24, 2005 - updated

Excessive PR spending has negative potential

 

Some of us in the anti-airport camp are uncomfortable with the level of Irvine spending on publicity for the Great Park. As we saw with the resignation of Dick Sim, and again with this week’s newspapers, over a million dollars of PR spending is drawing negative attention.

 

The page 1 headline in the Register’s local section on Friday was “Mailers' cost questioned”. The paper should have written “Mailers' purpose questioned”. Whenever the subject comes up, we are asked “Why are we selling something that is already sold?”

 

Do Irvine residents, who can read about the park in their free Irvine World News, need to receive four quarterly Benchmark brochures in the mail at a budgeted cost of $429,000? Our concern with the seemingly excessive spending is not just with the public's money. It is with the emerging controversy that could weaken support for the project.

 

As we look back on the County’s airport-at-any-cost campaign we see that over promoting and over spending had a negative impact on public support. The heavily funded “Just the Facts” PR campaign had an effect opposite of what was intended. It was widely lampooned as “Adjust the Facts”. The million dollar flight demonstration – a stunt intended to show that aircraft noise would not be a disturbance – turned into a PR nightmare for the airport cause.

 

The much-disliked airport was doomed to defeat before the passage of Measure W. Were it not for Larry Agran’s championing of the Great Park concept, the failed airport plan would have been replaced with a derivative of the more densely-developed Millennium Plan.  In 1998, Irvine voters overwhelmingly passed a City Measure D, supporting the Millennium Plan as the future use for the base property. It could have become the basis for an alternate version of Measure W, and it would have won broad countywide support. Agran’s leadership in selling the Great Park alternative and preserving more of El Toro’s open space will deserve lasting recognition, especially after park facilities are actually opened to public use.

But what is the justification for so much PR spending now?  Irvine Mayor Beth Krom is quoted saying “I think the value returned for the investment is more important than the dollar amount invested.”  What value? The Park won. That part of the fight is over. We are concerned that a growing perception of excessive spending is creating a magnet for criticism. It may lead to future erosion of support for the successful completion of the mission.

 

There is a vacancy on the GPC Board. The best publicity for the park project would be to replace Dick Sim with a like-minded fiscal conservative.

El Toro Info Site report, July 21, 2005 - updated July 22

ALUC gives up on El Toro Airport

 

This afternoon, more than six years after the last plane took off from El Toro; the Airport Land Use Commission finally acknowledged that “the MCAS El Toro property no longer meets the definition of an ‘airport’.”  The commission adopted a resolution accepting that “the discretion for the ALUC to continue to maintain jurisdiction over the environs of MCAS El Toro no longer exists” and that “the Airport Environs Land Use Plan is no longer applicable to the MCAS El Toro property or its environs.” 

 

Until today, the commission majority insisted that it had the discretionary authority to review development projects in the El Toro area for compatibility with military jet noise contours developed by the Marines more than 20 years ago. The commissioners refused requests - made by the Navy, two congressmen and the Board of Supervisors - that it revise its restrictions after the passage of Measure W. 

 

Over recent years, the commission majority repeatedly rejected arguments by its minority members that ALUC violated governing law by failing to revise the plan to match the intentions of the “airport’s” owner, the Navy.

 

Numerous projects in Irvine, Lake Forest and Aliso Viejo were delayed because of supposed military aircraft noise impacts on residential uses. Large amounts of public and private funds and much commission staff time was wasted in the process.

Today's unanimous vote came without debate. Former ALUC member Denny Harris was praised for his contribution. Three members of the audience spoke briefly in favor of the action. One long time El Toro advocate on the ALUC read a lengthy statement into the record reciting various pro-El Toro arguments but drew no response. It was over.


Irvine World News, July 21, 2005
“Brochure costs under scrutiny”


”The city paid a consultant [Forde & Mollrich] more than $70,000 to produce a glossy mailer on the Great Park project. Printers surveyed by the Orange County Register and [Irvine] councilman Steven Choi said they could have produced the project for less.”

”The total charged to the city for the mailer was $112,979, including $36,671 for mailing and distribution, as well as $6,000 for layout and design costs.”

"The eight-page, glossy [Benchmark] mailer was printed on high quality paper in four colors. It includes brightly hued graphics and photos detailing the Great Park’s progress through last February. It was sent out in the spring.”

”This is on top of the $600,000 annual retainer the city pays the firm to publicize the park. . .  Forde & Mollrich also was awarded a $600,000 retainer this year from the Great Park Corp., a board overseen by the City Council created to spearhead the project. Both $600,000 annual retainers were awarded the firm without the city going through a bidding process.”


Click for the entire article.

 

Website Editor: The IWN focuses on the production cost of the brochure. It fails to ask the question that bothered former Great Park Corp director Dick Sim. Why is so much money being spent to publicize the Great Park project to Irvine residents?  Click here for the GPC budget which includes “on-going expenses” of $429,000 for four Benchmark reports this year. The OC Weekly suggests that it is to publicize the incumbent political leaders.


LA Daily News, July 20, 2005

“Mayor reaches out to opponents of LAX expansion”

”Signaling a dramatic shift toward a regional approach to Southern California air travel, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is set to bring in a new airport commission and has opened confidential negotiations with opponents of the $11 billion Los Angeles International Airport expansion plan.”

”Villaraigosa had campaigned on a promise to limit modernization to the first phase that involves realigning runways, improving traffic flow and other broadly supported measures.”

”Jan Chatten-Brown, the attorney representing the Alliance for a Regional Solution to Airport Congestion . . .  [said the mayor’s] ‘vision is very consistent with my client ... to have a real regional system to take the pressure off of LAX, and to provide adequate, safe and secure airline service, including at Palmdale and Ontario.’”

Click for more . . .


El Toro Info Site report, July 19, 2005

ALUC wants evidence that El Toro was sold.

 

The Airport Land Use Commission meets Thursday to ponder this resolution: “If the MCAS El Toro property has transferred and evidence of that transfer has been received by ALUC staff prior to [the] meeting, adopt the draft resolution confirming that the Airport Environs Land Use Plan is no longer applicable to the MCAS El Toro property or its environs.” 

 

In addition, the ALUC will consider a request from the City of Aliso Viejo to permit 12 single family homes at a site “located within the 65 dB CNEL Contour Line (Noise Impact Zone 1)” of MCAS El Toro. The AELUP “deems residential use to be noise-sensitive and therefore unacceptable within this zone.” 

 

After Aliso Viejo submitted a 36 page document for ALUC review, the commission's Executive Officer notes that if “evidence of [MCAS El Toro’s] transfer has been received by ALUC staff . . .  the Commission no longer has jurisdiction to review the project.”

 

We hope the “evidence” is compelling enough to convince the commissioners to end the county’s longest running bureaucratic waste of time. Six years after MCAS El Toro closed, ALUC may conclude this week that it no longer is an airport.


Orange County Business Journal, Insider, July 18, 2005

“Build residences and they will come.”


OCBJ Insider Editor Rick Reiff writes, “Watch for mid-rise and high-rise housing to replace offices and industrial buildings [at the Great Park]. . .  Residential land commands top dollar, potentially better for master planner Lennar Corp. (already designing residential towers at Anaheim’s Platinum Triangle) and for the revenue-sharing-minded Irvine and Great Park.”

 

“There’s an abundance of commercial space at the adjacent Irvine Spectrum; condos and apartments at the Great Park could cater to Spectrum workers.”

 

“But traffic impacts of housing versus commercial will have to be kept in balance, as nobody dares to open Pandora’s box by tampering with the EIR. Bottom line, the Insider thinks the existing target of 3,500 residential units could double or triple...”

 

Website Editor: We always expected the businessmen at Lennar to extract some concessions for signing the development agreements that were unilaterally drafted by Irvine. If Reiff is correct, it would come as no surprise, nor would it hurt the park.

 

We wouldn't mind a few high rise apartments in the potential flight paths, just in case politicians try to resurrect the idea of an airport at El Toro. That is what is happening around John Wayne.


El Toro Info Site report, July 16, 2005

SD Airport Authority Board studies three proposed civilian airport sites

 

The Board of the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority requested further study of three preliminary concepts for proposed airport sites as part of the Airport Site Selection Program. 

 

The three concepts include potential civilian, non-military sites in Campo in the southeast corner of the county, the Imperial County desert, and a possible expansion of San Diego International Airport (SDIA) to add a second runway. The latter alternative requires extensive land taking in the developed Midway District of the city.  Click for an overlay map of the expansion in downtown.


El Toro Info Site report, July 15, 2005

Could there still be an El Toro airport?

 

At the end of a week that saw several important doors shut on the aviation reuse of El Toro, we are still left with this nagging question. Could there still be an El Toro airport?

Individuals as diverse as Larry Agran, Todd Spitzer, Tom Naughton and this website’s editor all suggested this week that a final door remains open somewhere, somehow, just a crack.

 

As we wrote below, this is a war that will peter out with no formal cease fire. Victory is in hand. But it will be difficult to know exactly when it is finally, absolutely, irrevocably over.

 

Read our special report, Is the airport dead yet? It summarizes and evaluates several factors that allow airport hopes to linger and what works against them.

 

Even the demolition of runways need not end the matter. Witness the fact that most major airports arise in large open spaces where there are no runways.

 

In the end, we conclude that barriers to a commercial airport at El Toro are a mix of economic, political and legal factors. In pragmatic terms, the airport concept "just becomes not worth the hassle." We expect that the push for an airport will fizzle and planners will look elsewhere. In the mean time, we remain vigilant.


Irvine World News, July 14, 2005

“It’s official: Great Park a big deal”

 

The local Irvine paper offers a smattering of late reports on Tuesday’s events.


They include one pronouncement that this reporter did not hear from any of the speakers at the celebration. “The city of Irvine finally can say ‘mission accomplished.’”

 

A sign to that effect was mounted behind President Bush when he spoke on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003 and announced the end of major combat operations in Iraq.  We hope this reminder of the lingering insurgency was unintentional and is not prophetic about what lies ahead in the pro-airport campaign.

 

The split city council renewed Forde Mollrich's PR contract by a 3-2 vote.

GPC Chairman Larry Agran graciously thanked former director Dick Sim Tuesday for his contribution and a help wanted notice is out for his replacement.


OC Register, July 13, 2005
"Military era ends at El Toro"

"The sun rose on Heritage Fields today, it's first as a civilian."

"Lennar Corp. got the keys Tuesday to the old El Toro base, renamed with a nod to the 56-year military presence on the 4,693-acre expanse that was farmed before the armed forces decided the land would make a fine airfield."

"Now the Miami-based builder begins in earnest the task of syncing development of the museums, schools, shops, houses and other built areas of the planned Great Park with the wilderness areas, athletic fields and other public areas envisioned for the land."

"Breakup of the concrete runways, taxiways and aircraft parking aprons is expected to begin later this year, which will put a symbolic end to the decade-long, $100 million fight over whether the old base ought to be converted into a commercial airport."


The Times reports, "Lennar, which formed a partnership called Heritage Fields LLC to manage the project, said construction could start as early as 2007, with the first homes going up for sale the year after."


"Some airport advocates cling to the hope that state legislation might retrieve El Toro as an airport site."

"'I don't think it's over, it's still remotely possible,' said Tom Naughton, president of the Airport Working Group, which labored to win conversion of the base to an airport."

"Naughton is a member of a shrinking group. Closing escrow 'brings closure to the airport issue,' says Bruce Nestande, a transportation consultant who worked for years to make the airport happen" before being hired by Irvine to do the opposite.

Website Editor: Several airport opponents also sounded cautionary notes yesterday that vigilance against pro-airport attempts is still necessary. Click here for several print media stories on the transfer event. This website's reports are below.


El Toro Info Site report, July 12, 2005

Denny Harris

 

On a day of celebration by anti-airport activists, we are sad to report the untimely death of Denny Harris. Denny won many friends in the movement during his years as a director of Taxpayers for Responsible Planning (TRP) and on the leadership committee of Citizens for Safe and Healthy Communities (CSHC) where he worked tirelessly for the passage of Measures F and W.

 

Denny was a long time member of the Airport Land Use Commission where, for years, he was the sole voice for rescinding the airport-related development restrictions around the former base. Those restrictions finally expired today with the transfer of the property from the federal government.

 

Denny is survived by his wife Karri, four adult and two teen age children.

 

A private family funeral is planned.


El Toro Info Site report, July 12, 2005

Runway party update

 

At the formal signing ceremony at Irvine City Hall, Assemblyman Todd Spitzer delivered a populist message overlooked by all of the many speakers who preceded him to the podium this afternoon.  “What the county really wants . . . I implore you . . . when we break up the runways . . . is to let the people keep a piece.”

 

It took some checking around to determine that Lennar will organize any runway events. The planning has yet to take shape. I caught up with Rich Knowland, Lennar’s Division President and Diane Gaynor of the company’s marketing and communications consultants outside of Irvine City Hall and gave them the message from the grass roots. Many people have worked hard for years to get us to this day and they are impatient to get a souvenir chunk of the runways.

 

We have Lennar’s promise to do something this summer and to keep us posted on the planning. We will pass the word. One caution: The corporate minds are already worrying about the liability aspects of a crowd of deliriously happy activists wildly swinging sledge hammers. But isn’t that how the Berlin wall came down?


El Toro Info Site report, July 12, 2005

An email from Washington

 

We received the following congratulatory email this morning that we are pleased to share with all of you who are on the "team".

 

Len and Team --

 

Just to let you know we received confirmation that escrow has closed and that Heritage Fields LLC is now the proud owner of El Toro.

 

You won the war!

 

David

----------------------------------------------------

David Haase

Realty Officer

Property Disposal Division

U.S. General Services Administration


El Toro Info Site Report, July 12, 2005

Today is the day to declare victory

 

The long war over whether there will be a commercial airport at El Toro effectively ends today with the signing of two documents - the transfer of title to the property from the federal government to Lennar and the reconveyance of the central core of the former Marine airbase to the City of Irvine for park use.

 

The fight for El Toro airport began in the 1980’s and burst into full warfare a dozen years ago. Momentum to build the wrong airport in the wrong place peaked in intensity in the late 1990’s and then headed rapidly downhill with the overwhelming passage of Measure F in March of 2000. The anti-airport campaign culminated in the passage of Measure W in 2002 and the election of an anti-airport majority on the Board of Supervisors.

 

This is a war that will peter out with no formal cease fire declaration, no armistice agreement, no unconditional surrender document and no peace treaty. While individuals may give up the fight, no general in command of the pro-airport side will step forward to hand us his sword. 

 

A dwindling number of diehards still cling to rapidly vanishing airport hopes. Anything is theoretically possible. We have to maintain vigilance against attempts in Sacramento to undo the will of local voters. But, the possibilty has much less chance of success with each passing day like this one.

 

Today’s key events may be as much formal closure as we ever are likely to get.

 

The fight took the work of many talented professionals, the support of scores of local elected leaders and the energy of thousands of volunteers who devoted themselves to passing two countywide initiatives under the banner of “No Jets”.

 

We are entitled to congratulate each other and celebrate. If ever there is one single point in time to do so, today is the day to declare victory.

El Toro Info Site report, July 11, 2005

“Great Day for the Great Park” tomorrow

 

Viewers are reminded that the transfer of title for El Toro from the federal government to the City of Irvine and the signing of the development agreements with Lennar (Heritage Fields LLC) will take place tomorrow. The public is welcome at a reception beginning at 3:00 PM.

 

The historic event has had surprisingly little advanced publicity in the press. It has been noticed on the city's website and here. One supervisor was unaware of the event until we asked if he was attending.

 

The agenda for the City Council meeting that follows the reception and signing ceremony includes a report from Mayor Beth Krom on the transfer of the former airbase. 


Renewal of the $600,000 strategic planning contract with Forde & Mollrich, referred to in the OC Weekly article below, is item 10.1


Part IV of Attachment 1 to the agenda item outlines the Forde & Mollrich contract's Scope of Services.  “All funds are reimbursable [to the city] by Great Park development fees to be received this fiscal year.”
Daily Pilot, July 10, 2005 - revised

“Narrow focus is airport group's only drawback”

 

AirFair, a grass-roots group that includes former Newport Beach City Councilwomen Evelyn Hart and Jean Watt, has one specific goal: to limit flights and passengers at John Wayne Airport. The group's motto: ‘10.8, let's lock the gate.’"

 

“What concerns us, though, is AirFair's narrow focus.”

 

“The issue of air traffic and passenger levels is not unique to John Wayne Airport. A solution to growing demand for flights cannot be reached by simply saying, ‘No more here.’ . . . Any realistic plan to keep John Wayne at the current levels will have to include alternate airports. . . Ontario, high-speed rail and other ways of transporting people need to be placed on the table.”


Website Editor: We agree that you can't just say "no more". We believe the County and OCTA need to be part of the solution. It is not just Newport's issue.

 

Click for the entire editorial. 


Daily Pilot, July 9, 2005

“Support of JWA caps is a good cause”

 

Columnist Steve Smith writes, “To those who tried in vain to get an airport built in El Toro, the support of caps at John Wayne Airport by those of us who opposed El Toro may seem nonsensical. But the two opinions are not exclusive, and there is a large group of people who simply do not want more air traffic in our local skies, whether it's eight miles away in El Toro or in our backyard at John Wayne.”

 

“If what you truly wanted all along is less impact at John Wayne, you will need all the help you can get [from the El Toro foes].”

 

“My position has been consistent from day one. I did not want an airport at El Toro, and I do not want more flights out of John Wayne. If it were up to me, I'd close John Wayne.”

 

“In exchange for this, I am willing to drive to Long Beach, Ontario or, if necessary, Los Angeles in order to fly.”

 

Website Editor: It’s a moderate approach, unlike that of the AWG, but loses credibility with that last sentence. The folks around Long Beach and LAX want caps to prevent more passengers from using their airports and Ontario has balked at proposals to add a third runway to take more of the load.


OC Weekly, July 8-14, 2005

“Agran Dispenses Great Pork”

“Massive PR spending will aid park chairman’s allies in upcoming election”

The OC Weekly’s News and Investigations Editor, Scott Moxley writes, “Using their positions on the board that controls lucrative Orange County Great Park construction contracts, Agran and his City Council allies have cobbled together deals that will put the county’s most powerful political consulting firm to work on a PR campaign designed to highlight the ‘successes’ of what Agran calls ‘the Great Park Team.’”

”With fellow Democrats Beth Krom and Sukhee Kang, Agran is set next week to approve the final stages of a $1,339,000 no-bid deal with the political firm of Forde and Mollrich.”

 

Of the $1.4 million in [Great Park Corp] PR spending [this year], the park board will give the firm at least $739,000. But Agran has been working secretly to renew for another year the firm’s $600,000-per-year, city-funded retainer, which expires this month. As it’s planned, this new no-bid contract would allow the firm to take over a portion of the city’s public information office. Discussions have also included giving Forde and Mollrich an additional fee equal to 15 percent of the entire Great Park PR budget.”

”Agran hopes to thwart any public backlash over the generous contracting by burying debate over the new Forde and Mollrich deal in a July 12 City Council meeting that one city official described as a ‘heavily orchestrated celebration’ of the park’s sale to homebuilder Lennar.”

 

Click for the entire article . . .

El Toro Info Site report, July 7, 2005

Development Agreement signing ceremony on July 12

 

Lennar Corporation will execute the Development Agreements between Heritage Fields, LLC and the City of Irvine at a signing ceremony at 4:00PM on July 12. The historic signing will follow a 3:00 PM reception to which the public is invited. Members of the design firms competing to become the “master designer” of the park will be in attendance.

 

The event will be at the Irvine Civic Center, 1 Civic Center Plaza in Irvine.

 

The signing of the Development Agreements is a crucial step in El Toro’s non-aviation reuse. Lennar will give 1,316 acres of land to the city and $33.33 million as the first installment of $200 million of development fees to be used for the park.

 

Under the federal government’s terms of the sale, the purchaser of the land is allowed 30 days after close of escrow to complete the agreements which are optional. Lennar’s decision to sign immediately upon the transfer of title undercuts any last ditch efforts by airport diehards.

 

Theoretically, an entity could have purchased the base at auction and not signed the agreements. In that case, development would be limited to a “Base Plan” that authorizes principally park, open space and similar uses as exist now and are proscribed by Measure W. It is the development agreement’s “Overlay Plan” that authorizes a more intensive and economically productive mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional, park and open space uses.

 

Until recently, airport opponents nursed private concerns that a deep pockets purchaser could buy El Toro, not sign the agreements, give Irvine nothing, and “land bank” the entire property. It could be held for future resale to be used for as an airport and profitable related real estate projects. While eventual airport development would require new state legislation, the possibility existed that such legislation could pass, particularly if Hahn’s Los Angeles administration had remained in power to push it.


Daily Pilot, July 7, 2005 -  revised

“Grass-roots group seeks to ground JWA growth”

 

“A grass-roots group aiming to block any future expansion at John Wayne Airport is drumming up support from local officials, but what they'll do with that support is still up in the air.”

“The Costa Mesa City Council on Tuesday approved a resolution supporting AirFair . . . AirFair's message is simple: no more expansion of flights, passengers or facilities at John Wayne Airport.”

“AirFair has support from a number of homeowners' associations and is now approaching cities in the airport corridor, but there are no plans to approach higher authorities or propose a solution to Orange County's transportation crunch.”

The City of Newport Beach is in negotiations with Orange County to get more control over the airport's future. The end of the current agreement [in 2015] seems far away, but "People aren't going to want to be driving to [Los Angeles International Airport] and are going to want John Wayne to serve even more people, so that is a serious concern to the City Council," [Newport Beach City Manager Homer Bludau] said.

Website Editor: Until the County has studied the eventual aviation needs of its residents, and determined how they will access air transportation, it is both wasteful and unwise to consider any deal with Newport Beach that binds the hands of future Boards of Supervisors.


El Toro Info Site report, July 6, 2005 - updated 9:35 AM

When's the runway demolition party?

 

We are asked repeatedly, “When is the runway demolition party?”

 

The Great Park Corp website’s calendar of upcoming events doesn’t list the transfer of the property – scheduled for July 12 – or any celebration of any sort. The Great Park Conservancy’s website also is mute regarding the close of the sale or any public rejoicing. The only activity posted is a reception for the architectural firms competing for the job of park designer.

 

This morning, we spoke with Marsha Burgess, Manager of Communications & Public Relations in the Irvine City Manager's Office, who advised that there will be a public reception marking the transfer at Irvine City Hall prior to the July 12 4:00 PM City Council meeting. The Council meeting agenda will include the signing of the Development Agreement between Lennar and the Great Park Corp.

 

The public celebration on the base, and ceremonial runway demolition will take a while to organize on the scale that it deserves. Stay tuned.


El Toro Info Site report, July 2, 2005

El Toro closed six years ago

 

On July 2, 1999, this website posted the story, headlined: El Toro Marine Base Closed. What now?

After 50 years of honorable service to our country, MCAS El Toro closes today. The flags come down during ceremonies this morning.

The big question is “What now?” Airport advocates hoped to start commercial cargo flights from the base this month, and to move FedEx and UPS out of John Wayne, but were shot down on those plans.

The runways will go quiet. The county says the delay will be until Spring of 2000. However, airport opponents, who helped to cause the delay, are working to keep planes from ever again flying from El Toro.

Click here for more . . . 



Click here for previous news stories